<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Too Stupid to Understand Utility of Outside-The-Box Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/</link>
	<description>The big yellow one&#039;s the sun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:16:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luxury Car Seat</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxury Car Seat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Apple is not evil nor too Stupid to allow this application in. It is just not ready. The developer can educate Apple on the product and it may well make it back into the store some time in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is not evil nor too Stupid to allow this application in. It is just not ready. The developer can educate Apple on the product and it may well make it back into the store some time in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avatar Free Online Games</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Avatar Free Online Games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Apple just likes to do things their way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple just likes to do things their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Penguin Cheats</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Penguin Cheats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Apple is not evil nor too Stupid to allow this application in. It is just not ready. The developer can educate Apple on the product and it may well make it back into the store some time in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is not evil nor too Stupid to allow this application in. It is just not ready. The developer can educate Apple on the product and it may well make it back into the store some time in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Brown</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Apple is going to act in its own interests.  And yes, that&#039;s just as evil as you acting in yours.  Its a total outrage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is going to act in its own interests.  And yes, that&#39;s just as evil as you acting in yours.  Its a total outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Brown</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Apple is going to act in its own interests.  And yes, that&#039;s just as evil as you acting in yours.  Its a total outrage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is going to act in its own interests.  And yes, that&#39;s just as evil as you acting in yours.  Its a total outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Brown</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Apple is going to act in its own interests.  And yes, that&#039;s just as evil as you acting in yours.  Its a total outrage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is going to act in its own interests.  And yes, that&#39;s just as evil as you acting in yours.  Its a total outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Johnson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PhoneGap: AIR for the IPhone</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Johnson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PhoneGap: AIR for the IPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] Someone has even tried to get a PhoneGap on the App Store - however, has had little success so far. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Someone has even tried to get a PhoneGap on the App Store &#8211; however, has had little success so far. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gishdog</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>gishdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-117</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but the &quot;Apple&#039;s just not ready for them&quot; argument doesn&#039;t float with me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is approaching iPhone development very dogmatically; from the NDA that a developer has to agree to when they download the SDK to the generic form emails they send out when they reject an app - it all stinks of premeditation on the part of Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is deciding which apps get into the store and which apps don&#039;t, without shedding any light onto why they make that decision.  If they wanted to encourage someone to resubmit an app at a later date when that person has followed all of the rules laid out, put quite a bit of time and effort into developing an app on their platform and been rejected with nothing to show for it then they should explain why an app has been rejected.  The mere existence of the generic rejection emails suggests that tons of apps are being rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m sorry but the &#8220;Apple&#39;s just not ready for them&#8221; argument doesn&#39;t float with me.</p>
<p>Apple is approaching iPhone development very dogmatically; from the NDA that a developer has to agree to when they download the SDK to the generic form emails they send out when they reject an app &#8211; it all stinks of premeditation on the part of Apple.</p>
<p>Apple is deciding which apps get into the store and which apps don&#39;t, without shedding any light onto why they make that decision.  If they wanted to encourage someone to resubmit an app at a later date when that person has followed all of the rules laid out, put quite a bit of time and effort into developing an app on their platform and been rejected with nothing to show for it then they should explain why an app has been rejected.  The mere existence of the generic rejection emails suggests that tons of apps are being rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gishdog</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>gishdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but the &quot;Apple&#039;s just not ready for them&quot; argument doesn&#039;t float with me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is approaching iPhone development very dogmatically; from the NDA that a developer has to agree to when they download the SDK to the generic form emails they send out when they reject an app - it all stinks of premeditation on the part of Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is deciding which apps get into the store and which apps don&#039;t, without shedding any light onto why they make that decision.  If they wanted to encourage someone to resubmit an app at a later date when that person has followed all of the rules laid out, put quite a bit of time and effort into developing an app on their platform and been rejected with nothing to show for it then they should explain why an app has been rejected.  The mere existence of the generic rejection emails suggests that tons of apps are being rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m sorry but the &#8220;Apple&#39;s just not ready for them&#8221; argument doesn&#39;t float with me.</p>
<p>Apple is approaching iPhone development very dogmatically; from the NDA that a developer has to agree to when they download the SDK to the generic form emails they send out when they reject an app &#8211; it all stinks of premeditation on the part of Apple.</p>
<p>Apple is deciding which apps get into the store and which apps don&#39;t, without shedding any light onto why they make that decision.  If they wanted to encourage someone to resubmit an app at a later date when that person has followed all of the rules laid out, put quite a bit of time and effort into developing an app on their platform and been rejected with nothing to show for it then they should explain why an app has been rejected.  The mere existence of the generic rejection emails suggests that tons of apps are being rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Petrosky</title>
		<link>http://britg.com/2008/09/08/apple-too-stupid-to-understand-utility-of-outside-the-box-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Petrosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britg.com/?p=435#comment-113</guid>
		<description>The web has absolutely no patience what so ever! When the iPhone 1.0 came out Apple had plans for the iPhone SDK but there was no way to release a stable product and a wide open platform in their time frame. Now, 2 months after the AppStore opens it doors people are giving Apple a hard time about denying a very small number of applications. Apple is not evil nor too Stupid to allow this application in. It is just not ready. The developer can educate Apple on the product and it may well make it back into the store some time in the future. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give them some time to take a breath! They are still trying to stabilize the phone and SDK when it&#039;s developers are calling into them. Opening these to web designers takes additional consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The web has absolutely no patience what so ever! When the iPhone 1.0 came out Apple had plans for the iPhone SDK but there was no way to release a stable product and a wide open platform in their time frame. Now, 2 months after the AppStore opens it doors people are giving Apple a hard time about denying a very small number of applications. Apple is not evil nor too Stupid to allow this application in. It is just not ready. The developer can educate Apple on the product and it may well make it back into the store some time in the future. </p>
<p>Give them some time to take a breath! They are still trying to stabilize the phone and SDK when it&#39;s developers are calling into them. Opening these to web designers takes additional consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
